Publishing Institution:
Project on Defense Alternatives
Since its inception in 1991, the Project on Defense Alternatives has sought to adapt security policy to the challenges and opportunities of the post-Cold War era. Toward this end it promotes consideration of the broadest range of defense options. Central to its mission is the development of "transitional security policy," which would serve to create conditions favorable to the advent of regional and global cooperative security regimes. In the Project's perspective a transitional security policy would: Guarantee reliable, cost-effective defense against aggression; Rely on military structures that do not contribute to interstate tensions, crisis instability, or arms racing; Allow significant reductions in the level of armed forces and military spending; Foster progress in arms control and in the gradual demilitarization of international relations; and, Facilitate an increasing reliance on collective and global peacekeeping agencies and nonmilitary means of conflict prevention, containment, and resolution. In its approach to security issues the Project seeks to uniquely combine pragmatism and vision. Although proceeding from a common security perspective, PDA pays careful attention to concerns about current military threats and requirements. The Project is premised on the belief that policy innovation can overcome the practical obstacles to progress toward more cooperative security postures - however, it sees the prerequisite of innovation to be a close and critical engagement in the mainstream security policy debate. Although PDA emphasizes the reformulation of US defense policy, it has contributed since its inception to the development of defense alternatives for NATO and has pioneered proposals for the "defensive restructuring" of armed forces in Eastern Europe, Russia, and the developing world. As part of this latter effort, the Project has designed arms control measures that would reduce the offensive character of existing conventional armed forces and reorient military assistance programs along defensive lines.
Visit Site
Resources:
-
May 31, 2023
Brinkmanship and Nuclear Threat in the Ukraine War
By:
Carl Conetta
-
May 30, 2023
“Nuclear Blackmail” – Misdirection in the Ukraine War Debate
By:
Carl Conetta
-
May 02, 2023
Catastrophe: The Global Cost of the Ukraine War
By:
Carl Conetta
-
February 01, 2023
Tempting Armageddon: The Likelihood of Russian Nuclear Use is Misconstrued in Western Policy
By:
Carl Conetta
-
October 17, 2022
The “Stable Nuclear Deterrent” collapses in the Ukraine War
By:
Charles Knight
-
June 09, 2022
Did NATO expansion prompt the Russian attack on Ukraine?
By:
Carl Conetta
-
April 03, 2022
Russia-Ukraine War: Estimating Casualties & Military Equipment Losses
By:
Carl Conetta
-
February 21, 2022
And So Now… It’s War?
By:
Carl Conetta
-
February 14, 2022
Putin’s Next, Best Move – The Logic and Limits of Russian Action on Ukraine
By:
Carl Conetta
-
September 09, 2021
Afghanistan: What Just Happened? What Comes Next?
By:
Carl Conetta
-
June 19, 2021
Afghanistan: The Fog at the End of the Tunnel
By:
Carl Conetta
-
February 01, 2021
Principles for Building Confidence and Stability into National Defenses and International Security – toward sufficient, affordable, robust, and reliable defense postures
By:
Charles Knight
-
April 01, 2020
Korea versus Korea: Conventional Military Balance and the Path to Disarmament
By:
Charles Knight, Lutz Unterseher
-
June 01, 2019
Sustainable Defense: More Security, Less Spending
By:
Carl Conetta
-
April 01, 2019
North Korea’s Conventional Military Forces: Relative Strength and Options
By:
Lutz Unterseher
-
January 01, 2019
Fundamental Design Principles of Confidence-Building Defense
By:
Carl Conetta, Lutz Unterseher
-
May 01, 2018
The Inter-Korean Summit Declaration of April 27, 2018: a review in detail
By:
Charles Knight
-
February 02, 2018
8 Key findings regarding the Korea nuclear arms crisis from recent discussions with experts in China, Russia and Korea
By:
Charles Knight
-
October 05, 2014
Something in the Air: "Isolationism," Defense Spending, and the US Public Mood
By:
Carl Conetta
-
June 05, 2013
Defense Sense – Fiscal Year 2014 Update: Options for National Security Savings
By:
-
January 05, 2012
Keep Pentagon Cuts in Perspective: What the administration proposes is hardly dramatic
By:
Carl Conetta
-
October 05, 2011
Going for Broke: The Budgetary Consequences of Current US Defense Strategy.
By:
Carl Conetta
-
October 05, 2011
The Pentagon's New Mission Set: A Sustainable Choice?
By:
Carl Conetta
-
October 05, 2011
Strategic Adjustment to Sustain the Force: A survey of current proposals.
By:
Charles Knight
-
October 05, 2011
Pentagon cuts in context: No reason for "doomsday" hysteria
By:
Carl Conetta
-
March 05, 2011
Continuing Resolution: Congress Goes Easy on DoD Rebalances Budget in Pentagon's Favor
By:
-
March 05, 2011
The Pentagon and Deficit Reduction: FY-2012 Budget Retains Exceptional Level of Defense Spending
By:
-
March 05, 2011
The Pentagon and Deficit Reduction FY-2012 Budget Retains Exceptional Level of Defense Spending
By:
-
January 05, 2011
Pentagon Resists Deficit Reduction FY-2012 Budget Retains Exceptional Level of Defence Spending
By:
-
June 05, 2010
Debt, Deficits and Defense: A Way Forward
By:
-
January 05, 2010
An Undisciplined Defense: Understanding the $2 Trillion Surge in US Defense Spending
By:
Carl Conetta
-
January 05, 2010
The President's Dilemma: Deficits, Debt, and US Defense Spending
By:
-
December 05, 2008
Forceful Engagement: Rethinking the Role of Military Power in US Global Policy
By:
Carl Conetta
-
December 05, 2008
Re-Envisioning Defense: An Agenda for US Policy Debate and Transition
By:
-
March 05, 2007
America Speaks Out: Is the United States spending too much on defense?
By:
Carl Conetta
-
January 05, 2007
More Troops for Iraq? Time to just say "No"
By:
Carl Conetta
-
January 05, 2007
Resolving Iraq: Progress depends on a short timeline for US troop withdrawal
By:
Carl Conetta
-
January 05, 2007
No good reason to boost Army, Marine Corps end strength
By:
Carl Conetta
-
September 05, 2006
Pyrrhus on the Potomac: How America's post-9/11 wars have undermined US national security
By:
Carl Conetta
-
September 05, 2006
Fighting on Borrowed Time: The effect on US military readiness of America's post-9/11 wars
By:
Carl Conetta
-
September 05, 2006
Losing Hearts and Minds: World public opinion and post-9/11 US security policy
By:
Carl Conetta
-
September 05, 2006
War and Consequences: Global terrorism has increased since 9/11 attacks
By:
Carl Conetta
-
May 05, 2006
Die Europäische Union: Stolpersteine auf dem Weg zur Integration (The European Union: Stumbling Blocks on the Road to Integration)
By:
Lutz Unterseher
-
May 05, 2006
Mechanized Tube Artillery as an Integral Element of Expeditionary Forces
By:
Lutz Unterseher
-
May 05, 2006
A Few Thoughts on the Evolution of Infantry: Past, Present, Future
By:
Lutz Unterseher
-
March 05, 2006
We Can See Clearly Now: The limits of foresight in the pre-World War II Revolution in Military Affairs (RMA)
By:
Carl Conetta
-
February 05, 2006
QDR 2006: Do the forces match the mission? DOD gives little reason to believe
By:
Carl Conetta
-
December 05, 2005
Masque of Democracy: Iraqi Election System Still Disfavors Sunni Arabs, Favors Kurds
By:
Carl Conetta
-
November 05, 2005
Arms Control in an Age of Strategic and Military Revolution
By:
Carl Conetta
-
January 05, 2005
The Iraqi election "bait and switch": Faulty poll will not bring peace or US withdrawal
By:
Carl Conetta
-
July 05, 2004
The Iraqi Insurgency & Iraq Security Force Development
By:
Carl Conetta
-
July 05, 2004
Radical Departure: Toward A Practical Peace in Iraq
By:
Carl Conetta
-
February 05, 2004
Disappearing the Dead: Iraq, Afghanistan, and the Idea of a "New Warfare
By:
Carl Conetta
-
October 05, 2003
The Wages of War: Iraqi Combatant and Noncombatant Fatalities in the 2003 Conflict
By:
Carl Conetta
-
September 05, 2003
Catastrophic Interdiction: Air Power and the Collapse of the Iraqi Field Army in the 2003 War
By:
Carl Conetta
-
June 05, 2003
Trends in the Incidence of International Terror Attacks on Americans After the Cold War
By:
Charles Knight, Melissa Murphy
-
September 05, 2002
First Strike Guidelines: the Case of Iraq
By:
Charles Knight
-
January 30, 2002
Strange Victory: A critical appraisal of Operation Enduring Freedom and the Afghanistan war
By:
Carl Conetta
-
November 11, 1999
Evaluating the Post-Cold War Policy of the United States
By:
Jonathan Dean
-
February 01, 1998
Dueling with Uncertainty: The New Logic of American Military Planning
By:
Carl Conetta, Charles Knight
-
October 01, 1997
America's New Deal with Europe: NATO Primacy and Double Expansion
By:
Carl Conetta
-
November 07, 1996
The Development of America’s post-Cold War Military Posture: A Critical Appraisal
By:
Carl Conetta
-
October 01, 1995
Vital Force: A Proposal for the Overhaul of the UN Peace Operations System and for the Creation of a UN Legion
By:
Carl Conetta, Charles Knight
-
December 01, 1994
Air Power Promises and Modernization Trends after Operation Desert Storm
By:
Kathy Bloomgarden, Carl Conetta
-
December 01, 1994
Low Flying and Security Posture: Examining NATO Military Low-Flying and its Future Prospects
By:
Alan Bloomgarden
-
May 01, 1994
Defensive Military Structures in Action: Historical Examples
By:
Carl Conetta, Charles Knight, Lutz Unterseher
-
May 01, 1994
Confidence-Building Defense: a comprehensive approach to security and stability in the new era
By:
Carl Conetta, Lutz Unterseher
-
February 01, 1991
Toward Defensive Restructuring in the Middle East
By:
Carl Conetta, Charles Knight, Lutz Unterseher
-
March 18, 1988
The Sometimes You Win and Sometimes You Lose Hypothesis: Some Comments on the Use of Models in Force Comparisons
By:
Charles Knight