Jerusalem Institute for Strategy and Security (JISS)
Abstract:
It is in Israel’s interest to solidify the Egyptian role in Gaza, in the context of “conflict management” as a governing policy concept. Egyptian participation in the efforts to stabilize the situation in Gaza serves as an important component in the vital Egypt-Israel relationship. It also helps erode Hamas’ pretensions of Jihad.
Jerusalem Institute for Strategy and Security (JISS)
Abstract:
He has cornered himself into a situation where he has zero credibility and zero leverage on Israel, the US, the international community, and even the Sunni Arab world.
Topic:
Diplomacy, International Cooperation, Palestinian Authority, and Regional Power
Jerusalem Institute for Strategy and Security (JISS)
Abstract:
The emerging informal alliance in the eastern Mediterranean is becoming increasingly significant. Egypt’s role, Erdogan’s ambitions, energy resources, joint military exercises and coordinated emergency responses contribute to the alliance.
Topic:
Diplomacy, Energy Policy, International Cooperation, Military Strategy, Alliance, and Palestinian Authority
Political Geography:
Turkey, Middle East, Israel, Palestine, Egypt, and Mediterranean
Jerusalem Institute for Strategy and Security (JISS)
Abstract:
Israel, Egypt, Greece and Cyprus must encourage the US to assert a higher military and diplomatic profile as a counterweight to Turkish pressures, Russian and Iranian ambitions, and Chinese inroads.
Topic:
Diplomacy, Energy Policy, Military Strategy, and Foreign Interference
Political Geography:
Russia, China, Europe, Iran, Turkey, Middle East, Israel, Greece, Asia, North America, Egypt, Cyprus, and United States of America
Jerusalem Institute for Strategy and Security (JISS)
Abstract:
The recurrent debate about Israel in Pakistan reflects the former’s improved international standing. The Muslim giant could become the next success in Israel’s growing acceptance around the world
Topic:
Diplomacy, International Cooperation, Conflict, and Rivalry
Jerusalem Institute for Strategy and Security (JISS)
Abstract:
Deadlock between Washington and Tehran won’t easily turn into détente even if Trump and Rohani do find a way to meet in New York. However, even a tentative rapprochement between the US and Iran would severely strain Israel’s close ties with the White House.
Topic:
Diplomacy, International Cooperation, Military Strategy, Rivalry, and Appeasement
Political Geography:
Iran, Middle East, Israel, North America, and United States of America
Jerusalem Institute for Strategy and Security (JISS)
Abstract:
The move confirms that the current US administration is not interested in heading an alliance of regional forces against Iranian expansionism or Sunni political Islam, but is, like its predecessor, managing imperial decline.
Topic:
Diplomacy, International Cooperation, Regional Cooperation, and Alliance
Political Geography:
United States, Iran, Middle East, Israel, and North America
Jerusalem Institute for Strategy and Security (JISS)
Abstract:
By changing the discourse about settlements, the Trump administration is laying the groundwork for realistic negotiation. Even if you think that Israeli settlement should be rolled-back in the context of a sensible peace arrangement, applying the demonizing epithet “illegal” makes for a destructive narrative that distances, not advances, peace.
Topic:
Diplomacy, Territorial Disputes, Discrimination, Negotiation, and Settlements
Mitvim: The Israeli Institute for Regional Foreign Policies
Abstract:
The relations between the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Israel are primarily
characterized by mutual interest and cautious rapprochement steps. The rapprochement
can be attributed to the pragmatic character of the two states and their shared interests,
including, inter alia, opposition to the Iranian nuclear program, opposing religious extremism,
regional trade, modernization processes, handling similar environmental issues, and
participation in global events and projects. The cautious approach and the limitations in
these relations derive mainly from the UAE’s avoidance of official normalization with Israel
due to the latter’s conduct regarding the Palestinian issue.
Topic:
International Relations, Diplomacy, Regional Cooperation, Conflict, and Rapprochement
Political Geography:
Iran, Middle East, Israel, Yemen, Palestine, and United Arab Emirates
Mitvim: The Israeli Institute for Regional Foreign Policies
Abstract:
In October 2018, the Mitvim Institute held its annual Israel-Turkey policy dialogue, for the
seventh consecutive year. The dialogue took place in Istanbul, in cooperation with FriedrichEbert-Stiftung, and was participated by Dr. Nimrod Goren, Dr. Roee Kibrik and Arik Segal
of the Mitvim Institute. The policy dialogue included a series of meetings and discussions,
with Turkish scholars, journalists, former diplomats, and civil society activists. It focused on
Israel-Turkey relations, in light of the current crisis in ties, and on Turkey’s foreign policy in
the Middle East. The policy dialogue aimed at helping improve Israel-Turkey relations, by
enabling experts from both countries to exchange views on regional developments, to
identify opportunities for better bilateral relations, and to increase cooperation between
researchers and policy analysts from both countries.
Throughout the dialogue, there was a sense that Turkey and Israel can find a way to
overcome their current crisis and to reinstate ambassadors. Nevertheless, such progress is
not expected to lead to a significant breakthrough in the relations. The Turkish counterparts
expressed hope that Israel and Turkey will resume talks on natural gas export from Israel;
shared their concern over what they perceive as Israel's support of the Kurds in northern
Syria; and pointed out that Turkey and Iran should not be considered by Israel as allies, but
rather as countries that cooperate at times regarding shared interest but are also competing
with each other and adhering to different ideologies and beliefs. The dialogue also
emphasized the importance attributed in Turkey to Jewish community in the US, and to the
impact it has on the American discourse towards Turkey as well as on US policy towards
the Middle East.
This paper highlights key insights from the meetings and discussions that took place
throughout the policy dialogue. It does not reflect consensus among all participants.
Topic:
International Relations, Foreign Policy, Diplomacy, and Bilateral Relations
Mitvim: The Israeli Institute for Regional Foreign Policies
Abstract:
The Mitvim Institute’s second annual conference took place in Tel Aviv on
December 30, 2018. The conference explored alternative directions for Israeli
foreign policy towards the April 2019 general elections. In recent years, Mitvim has
formulated a series of guiding principles for a new Israeli foreign policy paradigm –
a pro-peace, multi-regional, internationalist, modern and inclusive foreign policy.
The conference sought to translate these principles into concrete policy directions,
which will enable Israel to improve its foreign policy, increase its regional belonging
in the Middle East and Europe, and make progress towards peace with the
Palestinians. The conference featured Members of Knesset (MKs) Ofer Shelah and
Merav Michaeli, Dr. Nimrod Goren, Dr. Ronen Hoffman, Zehava Galon, Nadav Tamir,
Yohanan Plesner, Dr. Maya Sion-Tzidkiyahu, Zouheir Bahloul, Prof. Elie Podeh, and
Einat Levi. It was moderated by Nitzan Horowitz and Merav Kahana-Dagan of Mitvim.
The conference was held in cooperation with Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, and can be
watched (in Hebrew) on Mitvim’s YouTube channel.
Topic:
Foreign Policy, Diplomacy, Government, National Security, Diaspora, Democracy, and Resilience
Political Geography:
Middle East, Israel, Palestine, and European Union