You searched for: Content Type Policy Brief Remove constraint Content Type: Policy Brief Publishing Institution American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research Remove constraint Publishing Institution: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research Political Geography Washington Remove constraint Political Geography: Washington Topic Diplomacy Remove constraint Topic: Diplomacy
- Author: Nicholas Eberstadt
- Publication Date: 10-2005
- Content Type: Policy Brief
- Institution: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research
- Abstract: Contrary to conventional wisdom, which holds the North Korean state to be an unremittingly hostile “negotiating partner,” history actually demonstrates that Pyongyang can be a highly obliging interlocutor under certain very specific conditions. All that is necessary to “get to yes” with the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) is to concede every important point demanded by the North Korean side while sacrificing vital interests of one's own. The mid-September “breakthrough” at the six-party talks in Beijing would appear to conform precisely to this long-established pattern. The vaunted outcome—a long-desired “consensus statement” inked by North Korea and the other five governments engaged in protracted discussions over North Korean denuclearization—is being celebrated by diplomatic sophisticates in Seoul, Beijing, Moscow, Tokyo, and Washington.
- Topic: International Relations, Diplomacy, Nuclear Weapons
- Political Geography: Washington, Beijing, Asia, North Korea, Tokyo, Korea, Seoul